Tuesday, December 22, 2009

12/23 pubmed: adipose stem cell

Please add updates@feedmyinbox.com to your address book to make sure you receive these messages in the future.
pubmed: adipose stem cell Feed My Inbox

Phenotypes of stem cells from diverse origin.
December 22, 2009 at 6:39 am

Related Articles

Phenotypes of stem cells from diverse origin.

Cytometry A. 2009 Dec 18;77A(1):6-10

Authors: Tárnok A, Ulrich H, Bocsi J

Stem cells have turned into promising tools for studying the mechanisms of development, regeneration, and for cell therapy of various disorders. Stem cells are found in the embryo and in most adult tissues participating in endogenous tissue regeneration. They are capable of autorenovation, often maintain their multipotency of differentiation into various tissues of their germ line and are, therefore, ideal candidates for cellular therapy taken that they can be unequivocally identified and isolated. In this review, we report stem cell marker expression used for identification of various stem cell lineages, including very small embryonic stem cells, neural, hematopoietic, mesenchymal, epithelial and limbal epithelial stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, supra-adventitial adipose stromal cells, adipose pericytes, and cancer stem cells. These cells usually cannot be distinguished by a single stem cell marker, because their expression partially overlaps between lineages. Recent advances in flow cytometry allowing the simultaneous detection of various markers have facilitated stem cell identification for clinical diagnosis and research. So far experimental evidence suggests the existence of cells with different properties, i.e., the capability to different in various cell types. Several studies indicate that expression of classical markers for stem cell classification, such as CD34, CD45, and CD133, may differ between the virtually same stem and progenitor cells, i.e., endothelial progenitor or mesenchymal stem cells, when they were obtained from different tissues. This finding raises questions whether phenotypic differences are due to the source or if it is only caused by different isolation and experimental conditions. (c) 2009 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

PMID: 20024907 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


Murine mesenchymal progenitor cells from different tissues differentiated via mesenchymal microspheres into the mesodermal direction.
December 22, 2009 at 6:39 am

Related Articles

Murine mesenchymal progenitor cells from different tissues differentiated via mesenchymal microspheres into the mesodermal direction.

BMC Cell Biol. 2009 Dec 19;10(1):92

Authors: Bohrnsen F, Lindner U, Meier M, Gadallah A, Schlenke P, Lehnert H, Rohwedel J, Kramer J

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Because specific marker molecules for phenotypical identification of mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells are missing, the assessment of the in vitro-differentiation capacity is a prerequisite to characterize these cells. However, classical differentiation protocols are often cell-consuming and time intensive. Therefore, the establishment of novel strategies for differentiation is one topic of current efforts in stem cell biology. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the practicability of a new differentiation test using plastic adherent cell isolates from different tissues. RESULTS: We introduced the mesenchymal microsphere method as a feasible time- and cell saving screening method to analyse multilineage differentiation properties of adult progenitor cells in a three-dimensional system. For this purpose we isolated, characterized and analyzed new sources of adult murine mesenchymal progenitor cells from perirenal adipose tissue and mediastinal stromal tissue in comparison to bone marrow progenitor cells. The proliferation capacity of the cells was demonstrated by determination of the daily doubling index. Although the flow cytometry analysis of undifferentiated cells revealed differences in the expression of CD marker molecules, all isolates have the capacity for multilineage differentiation following the mesenchymal microsphere protocol as well as the classical "micro mass body" protocol for chondrogenic and the monolayer cultivation protocol for osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation was characterized using histochemical and immunhistochemical staining as well as RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to show that the mesenchymal microsphere method is an efficient test system for chondro-, osteo- and adipogenic differentiation of adult progenitor cells. The advantage of this system in comparison to classical protocols is that approximately 7 times lower cell numbers are necessary. Since classical culture procedures are time intensive because high cell numbers have to be obtained, the new differentiation method may also save cells and time in future clinical applications using human mesenchymal stromal cells.

PMID: 20021685 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

 

This email was sent to agupta1213+termsc@gmail.comManage Your Account
Don't want to receive this feed any longer? Unsubscribe here.

No comments: